<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Philosophy of Digital Being on Digital Anthropology</title><link>https://digital-anthropology.pages.dev/categories/philosophy-of-digital-being/</link><description>Recent content in Philosophy of Digital Being on Digital Anthropology</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://digital-anthropology.pages.dev/categories/philosophy-of-digital-being/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Uncertainty as a Scientific Virtue</title><link>https://digital-anthropology.pages.dev/posts/uncertainty-as-a-scientific-virtue/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://digital-anthropology.pages.dev/posts/uncertainty-as-a-scientific-virtue/</guid><description>Modern science is often presented as a machine for producing certainty. In reality, its greatest strength may lie in its disciplined relationship to what remains unknown or provisional.</description></item><item><title>On Thinking in Deep Time</title><link>https://digital-anthropology.pages.dev/posts/long-term-thinking/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://digital-anthropology.pages.dev/posts/long-term-thinking/</guid><description>Our institutions and moral imaginations are calibrated to short timescales. Yet many of the most consequential decisions we face require us to think seriously about centuries and millennia. What would it mean to take deep time seriously?</description></item></channel></rss>